Blow brought up the comparison between Clarence Thomas's hearings with Judge Kavanaugh's was that the Republicans then and now are not very fond of the Black Americans unless they need their votes. The fact is, both of them are no different than what they were in 1982.ĭeep down inside, Brett Kavanaugh and his totally wasted buddy Mark Judge are still the same 17 year old White boys who were always drinking and partying and trying to force 15 year old White girls to bed like they tried but failed with Christine Blassey Ford.īut the reason why Mr. ![]() ![]() Thomas and his accuser Anita Hill were Blacks.īut what we've to remember about this current Senate hearing is that what Brett Kavanaugh is trying to tell us : That he's not the same gambling and drinking buddy like his childhood friend Mark Judge wrote in his book. In the next line Charles also wrote "There's one distinct difference between the Clarence Thomas hearings and the Brett Kavanaugh hearings", meaning absence of race which was prominent in 1991 as both Mr. In his OP-Ed in today's NYT called "Thomas, Kavanaugh and Race" Charles Blow has given us a beautiful comparison between Kavanaugh's confirmation process with Clarence Thomas' confirmation hearing in 1991.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |